Innovation is not always Progress!
06/02/2019

At the end of last year, some of you may have watched the TV series “The First” about the first mission to the planet mars set in the 2030s. A statement keeps ringing in my ears – “Innovation is not always progress” commenting about use of high tech gizmos vs pencil and paper. Now I’m not advocating we go back to the age of the quill pen, but on our travels we see so often so-called “technology solutions” being applied to problems, either we didn’t know we had, or haven’t thought through properly.
For example, we hear and read (usually from purveyors of such “solutions”) about Business Analytics (BA) and Business Intelligence (BI) being banded around as the ultimate in predicting, for example, when crimes are going to happen, with claims that these can be prevented, or about how so-called Big Data (BD) will predict when a sophisticated engineering system is likely to break down, or about how Artificial Intelligence (AI) can be used to predict faults in a communications network. Well, without changing the way we think, this is all BS!
For this blog we’ll pick just one example from the Police out of many such claims across the Private and Public Sector. The claim is that, had a Force been using a particular BI tool, a murder could have been prevented. This argument is reverse constructed from the event and works backwards to show how, if certain information had been available in one place, the murder could have been prevented.
The Police are, as are most organisations, part of a “world-system” working in a “Complex Environment”. We’ll draw from some break-through work originating from IBM, but has been taken further by a number of practitioners and academics – the so-called Cynefin Framework for understanding the environment you are operating in. More on this in the next blog, but for now, suffice it to say, that using techniques designed for a “Simple Environment” or a Complicated Environment” – which most of BI or BA or whatever you want to call it is created for – they just will not work. In particular the “IF – THEN – ELSE” or “ISHIKAWA Diagram” (Cause & Effect) do not work in a Complex Environment. Which means you cannot work back from an event and firmly determine its cause(s).
What we have to do is to stop substituting bright and shiny new technology in place of CHANGING THE WAY WE THINK.
Only when we change the way we think will we make sustained and real progress.
Innovation is not always progress!
Categories & Tags:
Leave a comment on this post:
You might also like…
From taxidermy to forensic investigation: My journey at Cranfield
Christina Recheis completed her MSc in Forensic Investigation at Cranfield University in 2021 and specialised in forensic archaeology and anthropology. Her master's thesis focused on developing an algorithm to facilitate the identification of human remains, ...
Country stability and risk in BMI Research
If you need to know about country stability and risk, there are two Library services you ought to be looking at BMI Research. Country Risk report in BMI Research BMI covers country ...
How to present well as a group
You will have put a lot of work into your research or project and want to show everyone what you have achieved or discovered, so you need to impart this knowledge as clearly as possible. ...
Exploring the skies and beyond: My experience as a GREAT Scholar at Cranfield University
A place where innovation meets practice Cranfield University is renowned for its world-class facilities and resources. What stands out most to me though, is its unique connection to the aerospace industry. ...
Creating a new user account in Mendeley
Before you start using Mendeley reference management software, you will need to create an account. This is a really simple process and should take you no more than a couple of minutes. Just follow the ...
Shifting Gears: How virtual prototyping is driving the future of automotive and motorsport
The roar of the engine, the thrill of the track, the relentless pursuit of perfection – these are the hallmarks of racing cars. But even in the world of high-octane performance, ...
I enjoyed this a lot David. It’s a subject I’ve been ruminating on for a while. I think that the ‘conscious criticism’ taken from the scientific method and implied in your post is incredibly important in organisational decision making. I’m beginning to think its the quickest route to avoiding the echo chamber.
Speaking as a tech leader, much of the technology is persuasive in its own right, but as you mention coupled with the way its marketed (an older blog post of mine touched on this point https://alphastatecouk.wordpress.com/2018/11/13/roll-up-roll-up-get-your-snake-oil-here/) it takes a brave person to question. But question we must!
Keep them coming.