A long time coming: changes and challenges for the medical devices industry
07/07/2017

These are uncertain times. As I write, the UK government has triggered Article 50, signalling the start of Britain’s exit from the EU, and negotiations have just begun. This brings huge uncertainty and more than a little nervousness about what the future holds. Against this backdrop, the medical devices industry in the EU is also facing its own mini revolution. The existing EU regulatory framework for medical devices, which was first harmonized as a series of directives in the 1990s, has been replaced by the Medical Device Regulation (MDR) and the industry is now in a state of transition from the old directives to the new regulation. This represents huge change and presents a significant challenge, not least with respect to increased scrutiny of documentation specifically relating to the clinical evaluation of medical devices.
What is the impact of the change in medical device regulation?
All medical devices have to be shown to meet certain standards of performance and safety before they can be released into the market place. In regulatory circles, this is known as ‘Conformity Assessment’. There are numerous stakeholders in this process including manufacturers, contract research organisations, notified bodies (who are accredited by Member States of the EU to assess and audit all manufacturers and undertake Conformity Assessment on medium and high-risk devices), regulatory bodies (known in the EU as National Competent Authorities) and, of course, the patients themselves. Undoubtedly, the introduction of the new Medical Device Regulation will impact all stakeholders. For example, it places greater emphasis on manufacturers to demonstrate effectiveness and safety of all their devices through evaluation of new and existing clinical data. Notified bodies will face heightened scrutiny of their assessment of manufacturers’ technical documentation. However, for patients and healthcare professionals this should ultimately result in enhanced patient safety.
Demonstrating medical device safety and performance
Under the MDR, assessment of clinical evidence on safety and performance of all but the lowest risk medical devices is required prior to marketing in the EU. This is a more extensive requirement compared with the preceding directive. Furthermore, there is greater onus on manufacturers to prepare more detailed clinical evidence for devices that are already on the market and maintain clinical evaluation documentation for the lifetime of the product. Manufacturers now need to demonstrate a systematic and planned evaluation of relevant existing clinical data and, where there are gaps in this data, conduct new clinical investigation(s) using their device to demonstrate compliance with safety and performance requirements. This is a complex process, but guidelines and standards provide some additional steer on these activities. For example, MEDDEV 2.7/1 revision 4 provides guidance on the broader process of clinical evaluation. This was updated in 2016 and will now itself require a further revision to reflect the new regulation. International standard ISO14155:2011 is the relevant standard on good clinical practice specifically for clinical investigations of medical devices. The overall scope of this standard is unlikely to change, but it will also require an update to align it with the MDR.
What should stakeholders do now?
So, after much discussion in recent years, the contents of the MDR are now known and there is no doubt that the impact of the new regulatory framework is going to be wide-ranging for the medical devices industry – and the clock is already ticking! There are just three years to transition from the old to the new framework and it is widely acknowledged that stakeholder engagement is core to this transition. Training and education will have a key role to play in supporting and informing stakeholders during the early stages to ensure that the requirements of the MDR are fully understood. This is essential to ensure that new medical devices are brought to the market in a timely manner and that existing ones continue to be available to healthcare professionals and patients alike.
—
Find out more about our part-time Medical Technology Regulatory Affairs MSc and our upcoming Clinical Evaluation of Medical Devices masterclass…
Categories & Tags:
Leave a comment on this post:
You might also like…
Screening for FTSE 100 companies on Bloomberg
So you’re researching an index and need some data on its constituent companies? Bloomberg’s Equity Screening tool makes light work of this, not just for the FTSE, but for indices, exchanges and sectors worldwide. Type EQS ...
Accelerating my future: How Cranfield put me on the fast track to automotive safety innovation
Hello! I’m Michaela Kaiser, and I’m thrilled to share my journey studying abroad. I’m from Calgary, Canada, and I recently graduated from Cranfield’s MSc Automotive Engineering course. My path to Cranfield ...
From Myanmar to Cranfield: My path to Renewable Energy
As someone who is passionate about sustainability, my career goal is to build a path in the renewable energy sector. My aspirations comes from the benefits of developing sustainable energy sources and ensuring energy ...
From lifelong dream to circular economy leader: Q&A with Himesha Randeni on the Environmental Management for Business MSc
What does it take to turn a lifelong passion for the planet into a fulfilling and impactful career? For Himesha Randeni, the answer was the Environmental Management for Business MSc at ...
Library services over the Christmas period
Kings Norton Library will be open 24/7 throughout the holiday period as a study space. Library staff will work until 6pm on Friday 19 December and will resume their normal working hours from 9am on ...
From the control tower to Cranfield: My journey to shaping the future of airports
Hi, I’m Karima Lakouz, and this is the new me! I’m a Moroccan full-time student, aiming to graduate in 2026 with an MSc in Airport Planning and Management from Cranfield University. ...
