A long time coming: changes and challenges for the medical devices industry
07/07/2017
These are uncertain times. As I write, the UK government has triggered Article 50, signalling the start of Britain’s exit from the EU, and negotiations have just begun. This brings huge uncertainty and more than a little nervousness about what the future holds. Against this backdrop, the medical devices industry in the EU is also facing its own mini revolution. The existing EU regulatory framework for medical devices, which was first harmonized as a series of directives in the 1990s, has been replaced by the Medical Device Regulation (MDR) and the industry is now in a state of transition from the old directives to the new regulation. This represents huge change and presents a significant challenge, not least with respect to increased scrutiny of documentation specifically relating to the clinical evaluation of medical devices.
What is the impact of the change in medical device regulation?
All medical devices have to be shown to meet certain standards of performance and safety before they can be released into the market place. In regulatory circles, this is known as ‘Conformity Assessment’. There are numerous stakeholders in this process including manufacturers, contract research organisations, notified bodies (who are accredited by Member States of the EU to assess and audit all manufacturers and undertake Conformity Assessment on medium and high-risk devices), regulatory bodies (known in the EU as National Competent Authorities) and, of course, the patients themselves. Undoubtedly, the introduction of the new Medical Device Regulation will impact all stakeholders. For example, it places greater emphasis on manufacturers to demonstrate effectiveness and safety of all their devices through evaluation of new and existing clinical data. Notified bodies will face heightened scrutiny of their assessment of manufacturers’ technical documentation. However, for patients and healthcare professionals this should ultimately result in enhanced patient safety.
Demonstrating medical device safety and performance
Under the MDR, assessment of clinical evidence on safety and performance of all but the lowest risk medical devices is required prior to marketing in the EU. This is a more extensive requirement compared with the preceding directive. Furthermore, there is greater onus on manufacturers to prepare more detailed clinical evidence for devices that are already on the market and maintain clinical evaluation documentation for the lifetime of the product. Manufacturers now need to demonstrate a systematic and planned evaluation of relevant existing clinical data and, where there are gaps in this data, conduct new clinical investigation(s) using their device to demonstrate compliance with safety and performance requirements. This is a complex process, but guidelines and standards provide some additional steer on these activities. For example, MEDDEV 2.7/1 revision 4 provides guidance on the broader process of clinical evaluation. This was updated in 2016 and will now itself require a further revision to reflect the new regulation. International standard ISO14155:2011 is the relevant standard on good clinical practice specifically for clinical investigations of medical devices. The overall scope of this standard is unlikely to change, but it will also require an update to align it with the MDR.
What should stakeholders do now?
So, after much discussion in recent years, the contents of the MDR are now known and there is no doubt that the impact of the new regulatory framework is going to be wide-ranging for the medical devices industry – and the clock is already ticking! There are just three years to transition from the old to the new framework and it is widely acknowledged that stakeholder engagement is core to this transition. Training and education will have a key role to play in supporting and informing stakeholders during the early stages to ensure that the requirements of the MDR are fully understood. This is essential to ensure that new medical devices are brought to the market in a timely manner and that existing ones continue to be available to healthcare professionals and patients alike.
—
Find out more about our part-time Medical Technology Regulatory Affairs MSc and our upcoming Clinical Evaluation of Medical Devices masterclass…
Categories & Tags:
Leave a comment on this post:
You might also like…
Installing the Mendeley Citation Add-in for Word
As well as being a useful tool for storing and managing references, Mendeley integrates with MS Word enabling you to create in-text references and bibliographies. This is possible for many different referencing styles, including the ...
From Pakistan to sustainable manufacturing: My Cranfield journey
Hello my name is Dr Shoaib Sarfraz and my journey into the world of manufacturing began with a deep fascination for how things are made, how they can be made better, ...
Check out the updates to our Bloomberg guide!
Attention all finance enthusiasts, data wizards, and curious minds! Our Bloomberg: a basic guide just got a refresh. This is a great place to go if you’re thinking about getting started with Bloomberg. Here’s what’s ...
My Transformative Experience: Reflecting on the Global Clinical Supply Chain Conference 2024 in Malta.
As a scholarship recipient, I recently had the incredible opportunity to attend the 2024 Global Clinical Supply Chain Group Conference in Malta. I could not be more grateful for the experience. This conference was ...
Shaping the future of aviation: The NAC Women in Aviation Scholarship and me
Aviation has always been more than just a career choice for me – it’s a passion that began in my childhood and has only grown stronger over the years. Raised in ...
Breaking barriers in aerospace: my journey of passion, persistence, and progress
The aerospace and aviation industries have always fascinated me. From the complex technology to the incredible innovations, I’ve always wanted to be part of it. But my journey into this field ...