Innovation is not always Progress!
06/02/2019

At the end of last year, some of you may have watched the TV series “The First” about the first mission to the planet mars set in the 2030s. A statement keeps ringing in my ears – “Innovation is not always progress” commenting about use of high tech gizmos vs pencil and paper. Now I’m not advocating we go back to the age of the quill pen, but on our travels we see so often so-called “technology solutions” being applied to problems, either we didn’t know we had, or haven’t thought through properly.
For example, we hear and read (usually from purveyors of such “solutions”) about Business Analytics (BA) and Business Intelligence (BI) being banded around as the ultimate in predicting, for example, when crimes are going to happen, with claims that these can be prevented, or about how so-called Big Data (BD) will predict when a sophisticated engineering system is likely to break down, or about how Artificial Intelligence (AI) can be used to predict faults in a communications network. Well, without changing the way we think, this is all BS!
For this blog we’ll pick just one example from the Police out of many such claims across the Private and Public Sector. The claim is that, had a Force been using a particular BI tool, a murder could have been prevented. This argument is reverse constructed from the event and works backwards to show how, if certain information had been available in one place, the murder could have been prevented.
The Police are, as are most organisations, part of a “world-system” working in a “Complex Environment”. We’ll draw from some break-through work originating from IBM, but has been taken further by a number of practitioners and academics – the so-called Cynefin Framework for understanding the environment you are operating in. More on this in the next blog, but for now, suffice it to say, that using techniques designed for a “Simple Environment” or a Complicated Environment” – which most of BI or BA or whatever you want to call it is created for – they just will not work. In particular the “IF – THEN – ELSE” or “ISHIKAWA Diagram” (Cause & Effect) do not work in a Complex Environment. Which means you cannot work back from an event and firmly determine its cause(s).
What we have to do is to stop substituting bright and shiny new technology in place of CHANGING THE WAY WE THINK.
Only when we change the way we think will we make sustained and real progress.
Innovation is not always progress!
Categories & Tags:
Leave a comment on this post:
You might also like…
10 things to know about referencing at Cranfield (APA7) – a taster
Need to gen up on your referencing? Then read on. The following are some of the most important things to know about referencing in the APA7 style at Cranfield. 1. If you do not reference ...
Thinking about your literature review?
As part of your PhD or Master’s thesis, you will probably have to write a literature review. A successful literature review will offer an analysis of the existing research in your field, demonstrating your understanding ...
Introducing… Scopus
Scopus is one of the largest and most trusted academic databases, indexing millions of peer‑reviewed articles, conference papers, books, and preprints across every major discipline. Scopus contains more than 100 million records and over 30,000 ...
Do you know what makes a Technical Report special?
Writing a technical report is a little different to writing a lab report or an essay for your tutors, requiring a different approach, communication skills and format. What are technical reports? Technical reports are formal, ...
Norman C. T. Liu scholarships providing the next generation of opportunities to succeed in Air Transport Management
Cranfield University is proud to work with global industry leaders who believe in investing in the next generation of aviation professionals. One of those leaders, Norman C. T. Liu, has personally committed to supporting ...
Designing the future of space: My group design project experience at Cranfield
For three years, I worked at Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) in India. While my time in the IT sector provided me with a strong analytical foundation, my true passion had always been anchored in ...

I enjoyed this a lot David. It’s a subject I’ve been ruminating on for a while. I think that the ‘conscious criticism’ taken from the scientific method and implied in your post is incredibly important in organisational decision making. I’m beginning to think its the quickest route to avoiding the echo chamber.
Speaking as a tech leader, much of the technology is persuasive in its own right, but as you mention coupled with the way its marketed (an older blog post of mine touched on this point https://alphastatecouk.wordpress.com/2018/11/13/roll-up-roll-up-get-your-snake-oil-here/) it takes a brave person to question. But question we must!
Keep them coming.