Discover our blogs

Aerospace | Cranfield University


Agrifood | Cranfield University


Alumni | Cranfield University


Careers | Cranfield University


Careers | Cranfield University

Defence and Security

Design | Cranfield University


Energy and Power | Cranfield University

Energy and Sustainability

Environment | Cranfield University


Forensics | Cranfield University


Libraries | Cranfield University


Libraries | Cranfield University

Manufacturing and Materials

Libraries | Cranfield University

School of Management

Libraries | Cranfield University

Transport Systems

Water | Cranfield University


Homepage / Water quality: When are bacteria dead?

Water quality: When are bacteria dead?


Accurately testing the quality of our water is vital to ensure the safety of the water in our taps. It is essential that we are able to measure and monitor water quality accurately to ensure that the threat from bacteria harmful to human health is effectively removed.

Current approaches to microbiological water quality assessment are based around plate-counting, where the bacteria contained in water is applied to agar plates, allowed to grow and then the number of colonies that form are counted. This is a binary method, showing the presence or absence of bacteria. When no bacterial colonies are present, the drinking water is considered safe to drink. However, only 1-2% of bacteria are ever cultured per sample, as they will only grow in favourable conditions. As a result, some “living” bacteria which are not detected by this method may still be present in the water. Therefore, new techniques to monitor and regulate water safety are being investigated.

One technique which avoids this limitation is the Flow Cytometry Method (FCM). This approach measures the concentration of bacteria when suspended in fluid and passed through an electronic detection instrument. The method allows the bacteria present to be visualised, enabling all microbiological cells to be counted. It is also much faster than the standard plate counting method as the presence of bacteria can be detected in a matter of minutes compared to a matter of days. When water is treated with disinfectant, the bacterial cell membranes are damaged. The cell membrane protects the contents of the cell and so a damaged cell membrane is a very good indicator of a cell being “dead”. In the FCM, fluorescent dyes are added that enter different cells depending on the state of their cell membrane; a green dye enters all cells regardless of the state of their cell membrane, while a red dye only enters the bacteria that have cell membrane damage.  The intact and damaged bacteria can then be visualised on a scatter plot. Those that appear within a defined area, called a gate, can be identified as those with intact cell membranes and are “living” bacteria. Those outside of the gate are identified as damaged and therefore “dead” bacteria. The scatter plot shows a transition from intact to damaged bacteria cells, or from “living” bacteria to “dead” bacteria, as the bacteria appear to move across the plot from the gated to the non-gated area (see Figure 1). 

A team led by Professor Peter Jarvis, of Cranfield Water Science Institute, recently published a paper in the journal Environmental Technology, which reports the findings of a study looking at the use of this method for water quality testing compared to traditional plate-counting methods. The study found that, under laboratory conditions, the two methods showed similar trends when used to test whether E. coli bacteria are killed by treatment with different concentrations of chlorine as a disinfectant. However, the FCM analysis showed that cells could still be deemed as “living” at higher concentrations of disinfectant compared to the plate-counting method. When no bacteria were identified by plate-counting (i.e. all bacteria were deemed “dead”), the bacteria still appeared in transition from the gated area to the non-gated area on the FCM scatter plot and so some bacteria were still “living”. This suggests that FCM analysis is more accurate in identifying the presence of “living” bacteria. When using real water samples, bacteria were identified as present using plate-counting when they were in transition on the FCM scatter plot, so both methods show that there were still some ”living” bacteria. This suggests even greater congruence between the two methods for identifying when bacteria are effectively killed in real water samples.

Water service providers invest a large amount of expertise and resources into ensuring that our water supplies are safe to drink. This new study demonstrates the potential that FCM has to improve both the accuracy and the speed of water quality testing. Further research is needed to identify which bacteria remain present after disinfection and whether these are harmful to human health. The permanence of disinfecting bacteria in real water samples also needs to be investigated. The paper reports a welcome starting point in this line of research and shows great promise in the use of FCM analysis in water quality testing. As the plate-counting approach is currently mandated by the water quality regulator, revisions to regulation and policy would need to be devised if widespread water quality testing with FCM is to become a reality. If FCM is proven to be an accurate method as well as a faster method for monitoring water quality, this will help to ensure the safety of our water, for drinking, farming and industrial use.

To read the full paper, please click here.

Written By: Zoe Griffiths

Categories & Tags:

Leave a comment on this post:

  1. Martin Ronceray 24/04/2017 at 6:09 pm - Reply

    Are you also looking at pseudomonas and legionellae?

Sign up for more information about studying master’s and research degrees at Cranfield

Sign up now
Go to Top