Our relationship with robots is messy and confused
03/01/2018
An animal charity in San Francisco has become a target for much global criticism and local abuse, all because of the behaviour of its most recent recruit: an R2D2-style robot.
The 1.5 metre tall Knightscope security robot trundled around neighbouring car parks and alleyways recording video, stopping to say hello to passers by. But it’s also accused of harassing homeless people living in nearby encampments, who saw visits by the winking bleeping robot as just surveillance from an intruder feeding information to the police.
A social media storm led to calls for acts of retribution, violence and vandalism against the charity. The Knightscope itself was regularly tipped over, once covered in a tarpaulin, smeared with barbecue sauce and even faeces. It’s not the first time there’s been problems in the presence of electronic brains in the real world. A similar robot in another US city inadvertently knocked over a toddler; others have been tipped over by disgruntled office workers.
It’s an example of how robot technologies can provoke extreme reactions. Security was a real issue for the charity. There had been a string of break-ins, incidents of vandalism and evidence of hard drug use that was making staff and visitors feel unsafe, and it seems reasonable the charity should try to make people feel safer. No-one intended to interfere with the lives of homeless people, some of whom found the robot endearing.
New forms of Artificial Intelligence
The introduction of new forms of Artificial Intelligence into people’s everyday lives is one of the biggest challenges facing societies. How far should we let robots walk the same streets, live in our homes, look after relatives, perform surgery, drive our trains and cars? What kinds of roles are acceptable and what are not? And most importantly, who sets the rules for how they behave, and how they decide on priorities?
The potential of robot-enhanced living – in everything from transport to health and social care – and the huge commercial opportunities involved, mean we will become more accepting of robots as they become more familiar and inescapable part of our lives. But that central issue, of what kinds of robots we want and where, needs dealing with now. The debate needs to be shaped as much by ordinary members of the public as by technologists and engineers. We all have a stake in deciding what makes a ‘good’ robot.
Robot ethics
The British Standards Institute published the first standard for the robot ethics in 2016, the BS 8611. But that’s just the start. As part of its work with the BSI’s UK Robot Ethics Group, Cranfield University wants the views of the public on the future of robots in our lives (www.cranfield.ac.uk/robotethics) to develop new standards and inform the work of developers and manufacturers.
Our relationship to AI and to robots is messy and confused. On the one hand there are attacks on robots when there’s any suggestion of potential intrusion. On the other we’re increasingly attached emotionally to our personal technologies, to our personalised phones and tablets, and make pets of robot toys and anything which shows signs of engagement, no matter how limited and fake. We need to be clear-sighted about the future and human-robot relationships and that means debate now before the sheer scale of consumer opportunities and cost-savings make the decisions for us.
—
Find out more about our new Robotics MSc course: https://www.cranfield.ac.uk/courses/taught/robotics
Read more about our work in this area: www.cranfield.ac.uk/robotethics
Categories & Tags:
Leave a comment on this post:
You might also like…
The rain falls on everyone, but drought hits the most marginalised worst
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) recently reported that we will experience an increased frequency of climate-induced disasters such as famines and droughts and humanitarian crises like displacements, with Africa being singled out ...
Amazing experience flying onboard the NFLC Saab 340B
The Flight Experience module is one of the most awaited events by Aerospace Vehicle Design MSc students. A cold and cloudy Tuesday in January was the day when we had the opportunity to board ...
Library resource trial: Debrette’s Etiquette
We have organised trial access to Debrette’s Etiquette until 31 July. Debrett’s Etiquette is an unrivalled guide to protocol and modern manners, offering advice about: addressing royalty, people with titles and members of the professions ...
Unlocking the secrets of ancient technology with science: the new Cranfield Archaeomaterials MSc
We are a society that is very much intertwined with our ‘things’ – they mediate all our relationships. But why do people adopt certain technologies, and reject others? What motivates societies to choose new ...
A flying visit from Diamondo Earthrounding promoting sustainable aviation
As the world works to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions through various initiatives such as the introduction of grants and commissions for research advancement toward the further use of sustainable aviation fuel, Diamondo Earthrounding ...
1,000th Cranfield Defence and Security staff publication added to CERES!
We are very excited and proud to announce that the 1,000th Cranfield Defence and Security (CDS) staff publication has been uploaded to CERES, our institutional repository. Dicken L, Knock C, Carr D, Beckett S. (2022) ...
Personally I believe the adoption of AI and Robots will no doubt become commonplace in future generations. On a more philosophical footing are we not already human versions of robots performing mundane tasks in the same way at the same times over and over again every day of our lives? We perform many of these tasks unconsciously whilst thinking about more pressing or concerning issues that are more personally connected to our individual circumstances. What if these tasks could be removed, what if healthcare became automated, what if poverty could be eradicated, what if AI and Quantum computing could find cures for disease.
What if Robots and AI could remove the physical function of performing many mundane tasks building more capacity in our unconscious minds which could, over time be evolved and trained to focus on more positive tasks like building a society where we care for each other as a human race and leaving the robots to do the boring stuff. Tax the robots to fund more social support mechanisms, put more focus on the family and caring for our elders, live more creative caring lives that respects our environment and fosters more interaction with each other rather than aspiring to a capitalist regime that is based on a class system feeding off the divide between rich and poor. Rich get richer, poor get poorer. Robots and AI development could be the first step in our species making the next evolutionary leap removing the divisions in society and eradicating the class system which we live under.
Our lives would be much richer if we had more time to enjoy them and realize what is most important to us and we took the time to see the beauty that surrounds us and I have no doubt re-focusing our minds – conscious and unconscious on such things would only benefit society as a whole ensuring our survival as a species.
The BIG question is how willing BIG Business is prepared to adopt solutions that could eventually one day remove the need for them. For example the Pharmaceutical Industry – in a way they control the lives of millions of people and thrive off illness.. if AI and Quantum Computing were to find cures where would they find themselves ?
Just a thought !