Our relationship with robots is messy and confused
An animal charity in San Francisco has become a target for much global criticism and local abuse, all because of the behaviour of its most recent recruit: an R2D2-style robot.
The 1.5 metre tall Knightscope security robot trundled around neighbouring car parks and alleyways recording video, stopping to say hello to passers by. But it’s also accused of harassing homeless people living in nearby encampments, who saw visits by the winking bleeping robot as just surveillance from an intruder feeding information to the police.
A social media storm led to calls for acts of retribution, violence and vandalism against the charity. The Knightscope itself was regularly tipped over, once covered in a tarpaulin, smeared with barbecue sauce and even faeces. It’s not the first time there’s been problems in the presence of electronic brains in the real world. A similar robot in another US city inadvertently knocked over a toddler; others have been tipped over by disgruntled office workers.
It’s an example of how robot technologies can provoke extreme reactions. Security was a real issue for the charity. There had been a string of break-ins, incidents of vandalism and evidence of hard drug use that was making staff and visitors feel unsafe, and it seems reasonable the charity should try to make people feel safer. No-one intended to interfere with the lives of homeless people, some of whom found the robot endearing.
New forms of Artificial Intelligence
The introduction of new forms of Artificial Intelligence into people’s everyday lives is one of the biggest challenges facing societies. How far should we let robots walk the same streets, live in our homes, look after relatives, perform surgery, drive our trains and cars? What kinds of roles are acceptable and what are not? And most importantly, who sets the rules for how they behave, and how they decide on priorities?
The potential of robot-enhanced living – in everything from transport to health and social care – and the huge commercial opportunities involved, mean we will become more accepting of robots as they become more familiar and inescapable part of our lives. But that central issue, of what kinds of robots we want and where, needs dealing with now. The debate needs to be shaped as much by ordinary members of the public as by technologists and engineers. We all have a stake in deciding what makes a ‘good’ robot.
The British Standards Institute published the first standard for the robot ethics in 2016, the BS 8611. But that’s just the start. As part of its work with the BSI’s UK Robot Ethics Group, Cranfield University wants the views of the public on the future of robots in our lives (www.cranfield.ac.uk/robotethics) to develop new standards and inform the work of developers and manufacturers.
Our relationship to AI and to robots is messy and confused. On the one hand there are attacks on robots when there’s any suggestion of potential intrusion. On the other we’re increasingly attached emotionally to our personal technologies, to our personalised phones and tablets, and make pets of robot toys and anything which shows signs of engagement, no matter how limited and fake. We need to be clear-sighted about the future and human-robot relationships and that means debate now before the sheer scale of consumer opportunities and cost-savings make the decisions for us.
Find out more about our new Robotics MSc course: https://www.cranfield.ac.uk/courses/taught/robotics
Read more about our work in this area: www.cranfield.ac.uk/robotethics
Categories & Tags:
Leave a comment on this post:
You might also like…
How do I access the full-text of Harvard Business Review (HBR)?
This is one of the most frequently asked questions in the School of Management Library, presumably because HBR is such a key management journal and is renowned worldwide. The short answer is via EBSCO Business ...
Want to find out more about data documentation?: Workshop on 1 June
Data documentation is essential to make sure that well-organised and well-documented research data can be produced from our research projects. It ensures that your data will be understood and interpreted by any user. It will ...
Working on your internship report
Instead of producing a traditional thesis, as covered in our earlier post, some students in the School of Management - and perhaps some in other Cranfield Schools too - will embark upon on an internship ...
Embracing a Marketing and Leadership MSc Apprenticeship.
A Q&A with Faizah Azeem. Why did you decide to undertake a postgraduate apprenticeship in Marketing and Leadership? Cranfield delivers a unique programme that sits well with professionals wanting to develop themselves into expert ...
What is ‘Digital Forensic Science’?
Despite being a fundamental tool for many organisations and criminal justice systems around the world, arguably digital forensic science as a discipline does not always get the recognition it deserves in media broadcasts. Therefore, public ...
Pandemic PhD to prospects PhD
Hello, my name is Danni and I’m a third-year PhD student in the School of Water, Energy, and Environment specifically within the Soil, Agrifood and Biosciences department. My PhD focuses on how biostimulants (seaweeds, ...
Personally I believe the adoption of AI and Robots will no doubt become commonplace in future generations. On a more philosophical footing are we not already human versions of robots performing mundane tasks in the same way at the same times over and over again every day of our lives? We perform many of these tasks unconsciously whilst thinking about more pressing or concerning issues that are more personally connected to our individual circumstances. What if these tasks could be removed, what if healthcare became automated, what if poverty could be eradicated, what if AI and Quantum computing could find cures for disease.
What if Robots and AI could remove the physical function of performing many mundane tasks building more capacity in our unconscious minds which could, over time be evolved and trained to focus on more positive tasks like building a society where we care for each other as a human race and leaving the robots to do the boring stuff. Tax the robots to fund more social support mechanisms, put more focus on the family and caring for our elders, live more creative caring lives that respects our environment and fosters more interaction with each other rather than aspiring to a capitalist regime that is based on a class system feeding off the divide between rich and poor. Rich get richer, poor get poorer. Robots and AI development could be the first step in our species making the next evolutionary leap removing the divisions in society and eradicating the class system which we live under.
Our lives would be much richer if we had more time to enjoy them and realize what is most important to us and we took the time to see the beauty that surrounds us and I have no doubt re-focusing our minds – conscious and unconscious on such things would only benefit society as a whole ensuring our survival as a species.
The BIG question is how willing BIG Business is prepared to adopt solutions that could eventually one day remove the need for them. For example the Pharmaceutical Industry – in a way they control the lives of millions of people and thrive off illness.. if AI and Quantum Computing were to find cures where would they find themselves ?
Just a thought !