Choices, choices… is CORD always the right repository?
17/07/2018

As publishers and funders increasingly require that data used in your journal articles is published and cited, you might feel a bit overwhelmed at the options for doing this. Different organisations have different practices and there are various repository options out there. (For example, Springer has partnered with figshare, but Elsevier recommends using Mendeley Data). Does it really matter where your data is? Don’t we all just want to use the easiest and quickest solution?
Fundamentally, as long as data is published in a repository that meets funder and University requirements, it doesn’t usually matter which repository it is. Two crucial factors are long-term preservation of the data (10years+) and the assignment of a persistent identifier to the dataset (usually a DOI). The data description should also be open and discoverable online, with appropriate access restrictions and links to corresponding papers, etc.
If your funder specifies a repository to use (e.g. the UK Data Archive for ESRC work, or a NERC or BBSRC repository), that’s obviously the one to choose. Otherwise, CORD, our institutional repository, is a very safe bet and our repository of choice – that’s why we implemented it, after all! By sticking with CORD, you only need to be familiar with one system and process. You can use it for any research output with the relevant access control and reserve your DOI in advance, to use in your paper.
Because CORD is our institutional repository, it’s a nice solution as we have control over it, including terms, conditions, costs, openness, retention periods, data exports, free in-house support, etc, and it creates our central portal where we showcase our work to external partners, and generate our institutional metrics. You then just have one repository to use for all outputs independent of publisher or project, and will soon be using CORD at warp speed to upload data and other research outputs. In published papers, you can still simply link to your underlying data on CORD where that is the most appropriate repository – there should be no need to have to learn different repositories/processes.
Need any more help with CORD? Get in touch with us by emailing researchdata@cranfield.ac.uk.
Categories & Tags:
Leave a comment on this post:
You might also like…
Sourcing company Betas in LSEG Workspace and Datastream
Following our introductory post on sourcing Betas, this post will go into a little more depth for those who may be seeking more complex data. Betas are accessible in LSEG's Workspace service, through Workspace itself, ...
You could save a life: The real impact of learning CPR
When writing this, my sister told me to tell you my age. I won't do that, but I will tell you that I was in my forties, with no previous heart problems when I ...
Need to create a reference list or citation quickly? Try MyBib or ZoteroBib!
Are you looking for a fast and free way to generate accurate citations and bibliographies for your assignments or research projects? Perhaps you've tried some reference management software and found that it wasn't really what ...
Downloading the FileOpen plugin for British Standards Online
You need to install and use a FileOpen plugin on your device to access any document you find on British Standards Online (BSOL). This protects BSOL’s digital assets from copying, piracy, and unauthorized sharing. You ...
Navigating Change from Private Sector to Humanitarian Supply Chain Management
Seven questions with alumna Miori Naito, Supply Chain Officer in Kenya on her inspiring career shift from commercial to humanitarian supply chain operations, the challenges and rewards of her bold move from Tokyo to ...
Sadaf’s ‘gap-bridging’ MBA. A transformative Cranfield experience
After six years of digital transformation projects for a global, financial institution, Sadaf sought to scale her influence, contribute meaningfully to the business world, and lead change in a structured and strategic way. Recognising ...