Discover our blogs

Aerospace | Cranfield University


Agrifood | Cranfield University


Alumni | Cranfield University


Careers | Cranfield University


Careers | Cranfield University

Defence and Security

Design | Cranfield University


Energy and Power | Cranfield University

Energy and Sustainability

Environment | Cranfield University


Forensics | Cranfield University


Libraries | Cranfield University


Libraries | Cranfield University

Manufacturing and Materials

Libraries | Cranfield University

School of Management

Libraries | Cranfield University

Transport Systems

Water | Cranfield University


Homepage / Brexit: should the UK be in or out of Europe?

Brexit: should the UK be in or out of Europe?


Brexit - a British flag and a European Union flag

To many people, the arguments around whether the UK should go it alone or stay and help reform Europe appear evenly balanced. So how will the decision that will be reached at the coming referendum on 23 June affect Britain’s long-term economic growth and prosperity?

Europe, as the world’s largest trading bloc, is our most important partner. Official figures show that the EU accounts for around 45 per cent of our exports and 53 per cent of our imports. It has been estimated that more than 3 million jobs in the UK are directly related to trade with the EU so the future is uncertain. But as UK businesses inevitably attempt to diversify exports in the event of Brexit and as new bilateral trade agreements are signed, it is hard to quantify how many of these jobs will be lost, if any. Small businesses in the UK are highly entrepreneurial and have the ability to adapt to a rapidly changing environment but many larger firms may be less flexible, at least in the short run.

Supporters of Brexit claim that Britain does not get much out of EU membership beyond red tape. As economists, we can see pros and cons for both the “Britain Stronger in Europe” and “Vote Leave” campaigns. But the UK will still need regulations, and some laws that already exist are even stricter than those in the rest of Europe. An argument put forward by the “Leavers” is the financial cost in terms of the UK’s net contribution to the EU. The cost of membership to this market of  500 million people on our doorstep is somewhere between £8 bn– £10 bn per year  – equivalent to roughly 0.5 per cent of GDP.

Doubts about membership of the EU have been exacerbated by two linked trends – the rise in migration and the sovereign debt crisis which led, for example, to the Greek bailout. The Syrian refugee crisis has provoked discussion at EU level and a possible rethink about Europe’s Schengen agreement, which currently allows passport-free movement among 26 countries, of which 22 are EU members.

Mass migration is a sign that the EU is dysfunctional. Some people in Britain think that we have got a lot more inward migration than we would like. That said, the free movement of labour is a founding principle of the EU. The UK is heavily dependent on a diverse pool of migrant labour talent for contributing to its manufacturing, agriculture and service industries and, ultimately, the quality of life. Without access to Europe’s mobile labour market, the NHS, for example, would be unable to fill many of its key posts.

The one question we would pose in conclusion is: does the UK want to be part of the reform debate or does it merely want to opt out? If post-Brexit Britain becomes a trading partner with the EU in the same way as Norway, then it will have to accept things as determined by others – with no say in the rules and regulations that will affect us. It is only by being an active member of the EU that the UK can bring influence to bear and really bring about changes for the good of all.

Photo credit: Dave Kellam on Flickr:

Blog by Professor Joe Nellis and Dr Catarina Figueira

Find out more about Cranfield School of Management…

Dr Catarina Figueira and Professor Joe Nellis

Written By: Cranfield University

Categories & Tags:

Leave a comment on this post:

  1. Stephen Richards 18/05/2016 at 6:59 pm - Reply

    A well written piece and I have to say that I’m still undecided.

    I read somewhere that the EU makes it more difficult for us to make trade deals with countries outside the EU, is that right? If it is, wouldn’t being outside the EU potentially open up many more potential trade deals that could boost the UK economy?

  2. Flemming Carlsen 19/05/2016 at 6:27 am - Reply

    Hello Joe,
    one Brexit argument concerns the EURO, where the apparent need for ‘ever closer union’ and eventually some sort of federal unit of the EURO member countries having a joint fiscal policy, is at odds with the British publics view for the Pound and against closer union.
    What is your view on this dilemma? Apart from ‘being at the EU table’ could there be economic advantages for non-EURO countries ‘just’ being EFTA members with access to a common market instead of being some sort of ‘second class citizens’ EU members?
    Best regards, Flemming Carlsen (Cranfield FTMBA 2000-01)

Sign up for more information about studying master’s and research degrees at Cranfield

Sign up now
Go to Top