Is direct air capture going to save our industries and our planet?
We are about to experience the greatest disaster of our lives. Climate crisis is here. We can see the implications on daily lives – draughts, heat waves, uncertain weather. In my TEDx Talk, I emphasised the impact such drastic events have on island communities, not only influencing local supply chains but primarily the quality of life. These are the implications that all of us will face if we don’t act now.
We have globally committed to reducing our emissions close to net-zero by 2050 in the Paris Agreement. The UK has implemented the Clean Growth Strategy and more recently, the 10-point plan that aims to tackle climate emergency. However, reducing our carbon emissions from power and industrial sectors won’t be enough. Some industries are inherently difficult to decarbonise, as the CO2 emissions stem from the industrial process itself, rather than from the combustion of fossil fuels. Decarbonisation of the heating and transportation sectors is another hurdle that we need to tackle, and we may not make it on time. That’s why negative emission technologies (NETs) are crucial for us to meet net-zero commitments.
Direct air capture (DAC) is an interesting approach as it allows for scrubbing CO2 directly from the atmosphere. However, its role as a transformational technology is often misunderstood. After all, DAC isn’t meant to be treated as a substitute for emission reduction technologies, providing a green light for further fossil fuels use. DAC is meant to close the emissions gap that cannot be achieved by low-carbon measures alone. Not many people understand that DAC can give rise to a circular carbon economy, enabling us to save our industries and planet.
Although we may need to scale up DAC deployment in the next 15-20 years, we need to ramp up our R&D activity now to drive the cost down. Our recent review of DAC published in Energy and Environmental Science has shown that there is still a limited number of demonstration projects. The minimum cost of CO2 removal falls mostly between 400–800 €/tCO2. A recent project by my tutor group at Cranfield University has investigated how much it would cost for the University to close the 8% gap between actual CO2 emissions and target CO2 emissions via implementing on-site DAC powered by a combination of biomass CHP and solar energy. Their study showed that to offset 880 tonnes of CO2 per year, the University would need to invest £4.4m over 10 years. This is equivalent to 920 €/tCO2, a figure that is competitive with DAC offsets offered currently on the market.
Nevertheless, the current cost of CO2 removal via DAC remains high and isn’t competitive with other NETs. To enable a circular carbon economy, where we would utilise CO2 from the air for net-zero chemicals and fuels production, we need to the cost of CO2 removal to 50–100 €/tCO2. My research group has demonstrated that this can be achieved by considering new air contactors and process designs. Therefore, I’m certain that DAC, together with low-carbon energy and hydrogen sources, will play a crucial part in our net-zero transition.
Image: Carbon Engineering plant in Squamish, B.C. April 20, 2016.
Credit: Stephen Hui, Pembina Institute.
Categories & Tags:
Leave a comment on this post:
You might also like…
Life as a MSc Automotive Engineering Student at Cranfield University
I chose Cranfield University, because of its immense industrial connections and the depth of the modules. Before accepting the offer, I had a chat with a few alumni about their life here, both academically ...
My Experience as a C4D Scholar
How the C4D Scholarship made it possible for me to study MDes Design Thinking at one of the most prestigious universities in the world; Cranfield! I first found my interest in Design while in ...
Marketing sustainability claims: How to avoid greenwashing
As businesses strive to market themselves to best appeal to today’s sustainability-conscious consumers, it is perhaps inevitable that claims will be made that don’t necessarily give the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the ...
Representing Cranfield at the edie Sustainable Leaders Conference
I'm Caroline Harris, and I work for the Sustainable Business Group and the Bettany Centre of Entrepreneurship. As the Event Coordinator for both teams, I focus on creating and increasing engagement and outreach both internally ...
The importance of words in neurodiversity
The words we use in studying neurodiversity are important. It's easy to get caught up in the conversation about words. This is often generated by not wanting to cause offense or being in search of ...
The Sustainability of a Solutionist Mindset
'Have a solutionist mindset' These words were spoken by Ms Solitaire Townsend, the founder of Futerra, who kicked off the Edie 23 conference Consisting of 130+ speakers and 700+ delegates. To achieve the goals of ...
Can’t stop going through this post over and over again. There’s too much to do to achieve net Zero emission and that can only be possible if we maintain focus knowing that climate emergency is here. All hands must be on deck, we must save our planet from burning. Climate crisis is more than terrorism and weapon war put together.
This is the course I want to dedicate the rest of my life to. Looking forward to joining Dr Dawid Hanak and his team for my Masters program in Carbon Capture and Storage.