The future of operational performance management
09/01/2017
It always fascinates me on my travels that almost every organisation I come across, be it public or private sector, seems to think that their way of reporting operational (as opposed to financial) performance is peculiar only to them, involves measures that were designed by committee, and requires the use of the latest and greatest in “info-matics” as if there is a competition to cram as many different colours of the spectrum and different types of charts as possible onto one page! Why?
Alongside this, there seems to be some sort of reporting timeline “straitjacket” that dictates that this operational reporting be delivered on a monthly basis. Why?
It may be worth exploring the comparison between operational performance management and financial performance management. So this is a starter for 10!
Financial performance management has been around in more or less its current form since Venetian times – say 500 years. So it’s had some time to evolve and mature a standard way of reporting! And with that, we would be very surprised if a financial performance report did not start with something like a P/L review. A P/L review would contain some well-defined and well-understood measures like revenue, cost and profit (crudely speaking). So we don’t see people getting ridiculously creative in presenting exotic ratios or complex combinations of measures, or visualisation of P/L every which way there is in graphical form.
If we’re being generous, let’s say operational performance measurement has been around since the 1970s – some 50 years or so. So in comparison to financial performance reporting, it’s still very early doors! Suppose we transport ourselves another 20 – 50 years (assume we’re able to move faster than during the last millennium) into the future – can we predict what a standard way of reporting operational performance might look like?
Would it contain just a standard set of measures?
Would it be presented in a standard way?
Would it be presented on a monthly basis?
See our next blog for the answers to these questions.
Categories & Tags:
Leave a comment on this post:
You might also like…
Getting started on your business and management thesis or research project
Doing a research project - whether it's a thesis, business plan, internship or consultancy project - can be a daunting task, and you might have some questions around how to get started. This post is ...
Getting started on your Master’s thesis
Please note: This post is intended to provide advice to all students undertaking a thesis in engineering or applied sciences. There is separate advice for business and management students. Choosing your thesis topic Your course ...
Systematic literature review – Identifying your search terms and constructing your search strings
Our previous posts on the systematic review have looked at getting started and selecting your sources. In this post we will look at the next fundamental stage: Identifying your search terms and constructing your search ...
The importance of metadiscourse in academic writing
Metadiscourse (or ‘metatext’) is a key feature of academic writing. Hyland (2019) describes it as the writer's “interpersonal communication” and it refers to the parts of your text that talk about your argument in order ...
Systematic literature review – Selecting your sources
In our previous systematic literature review post we identified some background reading for getting started, explained how to find other systematic literature reviews to help you understand what is required, and how reviews should be structured and written ...
Systematic literature review – Where do I begin?
Undertaking a systematic literature review can seem a bit daunting so breaking it down into separate stages is a good way to begin. In this blog post we’re going to identify some background reading and ...