The Bigger Bang
22/05/2015

The news in today’s newspapers about the fines being handed out to the banks again takes me back to the “big bang”; the change that happened in the City of London in the late 1980s.
Before that date, the city was seen by many as a gentleman’s club. That wasn’t a bad description. But in that pre-big bang state, those in the city had real skin in the game in that they owned (or part owned) the institutions whose money they were gambling. They weren’t just hoping for success, they were concerned about failure and the impact that would have on their wealth and reputation.
It was at that time my wife’s colleague at City University and friend George Webb wrote the book “The Bigger Bang”, and how prophetic that phrase seems to be now!
Now we pay people to gamble other people’s money. And guess what they do? Yes they gamble other people’s money, our money. But such people are incentivised to share in the success but have no stake in the failure. These are the perverse incentives that seem to inhabit our financial world.
I remember as a young manager joining the Unilever share option scheme. It seemed odd at the time. I could invest my money in the shares if the company’s share price went up, but I could take the money out if it didn’t. Almost a one way bet and that is the way we appear to incentivise many executives. But I would prefer to buy shares in a company such as Berkshire Hathaway where those running the business such as Warren Buffett could lose as well as make money.
The consultants Stern Stewart developed their approach to increasing Economic Value Added in the 1990s but even they realised bonuses needed to be pooled so that profits one year were not all paid out, but partly held against future negative consequences over the next two years.
But in today’s markets, we are paying out more in bonuses to employees than the financial institutions are paying out in dividends to shareholders. And we tolerate it! It is high time we got back to basics. That doesn’t mean we don’t incentivise people but that we actually take the time to create an incentive system that encourages people to take appropriate risks whilst managing our money.
Mike Bourne.
Categories & Tags:
Leave a comment on this post:
You might also like…
Referencing the use of generative AI in your work
We recognise that Artificial Intelligence (AI) has, and will increasingly, become a part of our everyday lives and that we need to adapt to it. Hopefully you will have already seen the guidance for staff ...
When AI gets it wrong, who answers? Bridging the ‘confidence gap’ for tech-enabled transformation
Ask AI why it exists and it will tell you it was developed to enable machines to perform ‘human-like intellectual tasks’ including reasoning, learning and problem-solving. We seek out AI to help find answers: ...
Reducing your costs as an international student (without missing out)
Moving to another country to study is exciting, and it's also a big financial step. The good news is that budgeting doesn't have to mean missing out. We asked Dr Lakshmy Subramanian, Course Director ...
Need some help settling in? Wobble Week 2026
Whether you’re finding it hard to settle into your course or accommodation, you arrived late and are struggling to catch up, you feel overwhelmed or you can’t remember everything you’ve already been told, we can ...
Moving to the UK to study? How to plan for banking, exchange rates and transfers
Currency and banking are two of the most practical parts of financial planning for international students. They are also often the most overlooked. We asked Dr Lakshmy Subramanian, Course Director for Cranfield University's Banking, ...
Cranfield: an environment where innovation thrives
The latest Knowledge Exchange Framework rankings from UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) gives an insight into the real and meaningful impact that UK universities have. The seven categories that make up KEF6 cover everything ...
