Is it worth the risk?
04/07/2017

Recent events, namely the awful Grenfell Tower fire and its aftermath, prompted me to think about risk. A common definition of risk is: “ a situation involving exposure to danger”. We all know that just to be alive is to expose oneself to danger, it can’t be avoided. Naturally we take steps to ensure we limit the level of our exposure. But where do we draw the line?
At one extreme, we could avoid the risk of commuting to work or even the risk of tripping on the pavement outside by staying in bed all day – but that would bring with it all the risks associated with lack of exercise and loneliness. Even laughing holds risks, although few of us would think about that. Laughing, it seems, helps you to burn calories and increases your tolerance to pain. But, occasionally it can cause dislocation of the jaw and the spread of infectious diseases and some very unfortunate people have had the misfortune of inhaling foreign objects.
Then there’s a psychological element to be considered. One person’s “risk” is another person’s adventure.
It made me wonder what all this means for businesses which as we know face many different types of risk from health and safety to finance and reputational risk. It’s impossible for an organisation to be “risk free”, just as it’s impossible for an individual to live a risk- free life. There would be no innovation for a start and a risk-free business would probably be a very boring place to work (just imagine all the rules, regulations and processes!). Rather like people, some businesses are naturally risk averse and in some cases it’s probably right that they should be. I don’t want other people taking too much risk with my life savings, for example. On the other hand if it’s only held “safely” in cash, that very security creates a risk if there is any inflation.
So, perhaps it’s worth reflecting both on our own individual attitude to risk and on our organisation’s. Are we so risk averse that we are prevented from doing useful things? Or perhaps we are sailing too close to the wind and taking too many risks? What is the effect on the culture of our organisation? Are there too many processes, rules and bureaucracy? Or, perhaps we encourage employees to take too many risks in order to get on?
The thing to remember is nothing is risk free. Money we spend mitigating a risk in one area is money we can’t spend doing something in another. Time we spend scrutinising one project is time taken from other things. Not doing something means the development and learning that would have been gained is lost. So the risks of not taking risks too have consequences.
Pippa Bourne
Categories & Tags:
Leave a comment on this post:
Comments are closed.
You might also like…
Referencing the use of generative AI in your work
We recognise that Artificial Intelligence (AI) has, and will increasingly, become a part of our everyday lives and that we need to adapt to it. Hopefully you will have already seen the guidance for staff ...
When AI gets it wrong, who answers? Bridging the ‘confidence gap’ for tech-enabled transformation
Ask AI why it exists and it will tell you it was developed to enable machines to perform ‘human-like intellectual tasks’ including reasoning, learning and problem-solving. We seek out AI to help find answers: ...
Reducing your costs as an international student (without missing out)
Moving to another country to study is exciting, and it's also a big financial step. The good news is that budgeting doesn't have to mean missing out. We asked Dr Lakshmy Subramanian, Course Director ...
Need some help settling in? Wobble Week 2026
Whether you’re finding it hard to settle into your course or accommodation, you arrived late and are struggling to catch up, you feel overwhelmed or you can’t remember everything you’ve already been told, we can ...
Moving to the UK to study? How to plan for banking, exchange rates and transfers
Currency and banking are two of the most practical parts of financial planning for international students. They are also often the most overlooked. We asked Dr Lakshmy Subramanian, Course Director for Cranfield University's Banking, ...
Cranfield: an environment where innovation thrives
The latest Knowledge Exchange Framework rankings from UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) gives an insight into the real and meaningful impact that UK universities have. The seven categories that make up KEF6 cover everything ...

Pippa, Some good questions???? I have always seen good risk management as the flip-side of the coin to good (business) process management. In that context it is much easier to do the usual risk management “gamble” – identify risk, categorise risk, how much do we spend on mitigating risk, and where stuff outside our control (if it’s inside our control, then it’s the business process at fault) happens, what’s the contingency plan – and then striking a balance between the mitigation cost and contingency cost.
It’s unfortunate that the Borough of Kensington & Chelsea’s Procure to Pay (P2P) Process was seriously flawed in the decision to purchase non-fire-resistant cladding for such a structure and worse, did not have any contingency plan in case of fire. The real shame is that the owners of the process and decisions they took gambled with the lives of Grenfell Tower’s residents, while the risk the process owners had was to their livelihood (i.e. reputational, and financial). Not quite balanced in my book!