The future of operational performance management
09/01/2017
It always fascinates me on my travels that almost every organisation I come across, be it public or private sector, seems to think that their way of reporting operational (as opposed to financial) performance is peculiar only to them, involves measures that were designed by committee, and requires the use of the latest and greatest in “info-matics” as if there is a competition to cram as many different colours of the spectrum and different types of charts as possible onto one page! Why?
Alongside this, there seems to be some sort of reporting timeline “straitjacket” that dictates that this operational reporting be delivered on a monthly basis. Why?
It may be worth exploring the comparison between operational performance management and financial performance management. So this is a starter for 10!
Financial performance management has been around in more or less its current form since Venetian times – say 500 years. So it’s had some time to evolve and mature a standard way of reporting! And with that, we would be very surprised if a financial performance report did not start with something like a P/L review. A P/L review would contain some well-defined and well-understood measures like revenue, cost and profit (crudely speaking). So we don’t see people getting ridiculously creative in presenting exotic ratios or complex combinations of measures, or visualisation of P/L every which way there is in graphical form.
If we’re being generous, let’s say operational performance measurement has been around since the 1970s – some 50 years or so. So in comparison to financial performance reporting, it’s still very early doors! Suppose we transport ourselves another 20 – 50 years (assume we’re able to move faster than during the last millennium) into the future – can we predict what a standard way of reporting operational performance might look like?
Would it contain just a standard set of measures?
Would it be presented in a standard way?
Would it be presented on a monthly basis?
See our next blog for the answers to these questions.
Categories & Tags:
Leave a comment on this post:
You might also like…
From Pakistan to sustainable manufacturing: My Cranfield journey
Hello my name is Dr Shoaib Sarfraz and my journey into the world of manufacturing began with a deep fascination for how things are made, how they can be made better, ...
Check out the updates to our Bloomberg guide!
Attention all finance enthusiasts, data wizards, and curious minds! Our Bloomberg: a basic guide just got a refresh. This is a great place to go if you’re thinking about getting started with Bloomberg. Here’s what’s ...
My Transformative Experience: Reflecting on the Global Clinical Supply Chain Conference 2024 in Malta.
As a scholarship recipient, I recently had the incredible opportunity to attend the 2024 Global Clinical Supply Chain Group Conference in Malta. I could not be more grateful for the experience. This conference was ...
Shaping the future of aviation: The NAC Women in Aviation Scholarship and me
Aviation has always been more than just a career choice for me – it’s a passion that began in my childhood and has only grown stronger over the years. Raised in ...
Breaking barriers in aerospace: my journey of passion, persistence, and progress
The aerospace and aviation industries have always fascinated me. From the complex technology to the incredible innovations, I’ve always wanted to be part of it. But my journey into this field ...
The successful scaling of SAF production depends on a skilled workforce
In a two-year project called Waypoint 2050, the aviation sector outlined several potential pathways to reach its 2050 goal and how, with the right support from governments, net-zero emissions could potentially be achievable a ...