A different take on Inflation!
19/03/2024

It seems economists, the Government, and the Bank of England, amongst others, are somewhat interested in the inflation figure for February (figures due to be released Wednesday 20 March). It’s viewed as a critical figure as it is likely to influence the interest rate the Bank will set – which in turn affects many people’s mortgages.
The problem is that these eminent bodies continue to make the mistake of comparing one spot result against another. “It was 4.0% in December, and we forecast a slight rise to 4.1% in January”, was the consensus. What they fail to realise is that the reality is each of these individual results was / will be an accident.
It’s a highly VUCA (Volatile, Uncertain, Complex and Ambiguous) world, and that is especially true for the economy. Therefore a more useful way to look at and respond to inflation would be to use a proven statistical technique to assist in better understanding and thus predicting inflation figures.
We’ve applied our advanced SPC-technique to the monthly UK inflation figures back to January 1989, as shown in the chart below.
The actual results so far are plotted in blue (there are some red and green results in the past where there were sudden, unpredictable changes), the upper and lower red lines are guidelines to a likely performance corridor, and the green line is the likely average over time. You can see that there are discontinuities in the performance corridor, the last one being around the beginning of 2023, where sudden changes in the results bring in a new performance regime. Up to the end of 2022, you can see inflation was on the rise – since then it’s on the decline.
By projecting the performance corridor forwards, the chart above is suggesting that February 2024’s result is likely to be around 3.6%+1.7%. Or to put it another way, it’s most likely to be around 3.6%, and is less and less likely to be a result as you get closer and closer to the upper (1.7% above the average line) or lower (1.7% below the average line) red guideline. And it’s highly unlikely to be a result outside the performance corridor (red or green x) – unless something unusual happens.
So roll on 20 March – not quite the Ides of March, but still close enough for something unusual to happen!
Categories & Tags:
Leave a comment on this post:
You might also like…
Systematic literature review – Identifying your search terms and constructing your search strings
Our previous posts on the systematic review have looked at getting started and selecting your sources. In this post we will look at the next fundamental stage: Identifying your search terms and constructing your search ...
The importance of metadiscourse in academic writing
Metadiscourse (or ‘metatext’) is a key feature of academic writing. Hyland (2019) describes it as the writer's “interpersonal communication” and it refers to the parts of your text that talk about your argument in order ...
Systematic literature review – Selecting your sources
In our previous systematic literature review post we identified some background reading for getting started, explained how to find other systematic literature reviews to help you understand what is required, and how reviews should be structured and written ...
Systematic literature review – Where do I begin?
Undertaking a systematic literature review can seem a bit daunting so breaking it down into separate stages is a good way to begin. In this blog post we’re going to identify some background reading and ...
Bank holiday hours for Library Services: Monday 4 May
Library Services staff will be taking a break on Monday 4 May for the early May bank holiday. You will still be able to access all the online resources and help you need via our ...
10 things to know about referencing at Cranfield (APA7) – a taster
Need to gen up on your referencing? Then read on. The following are some of the most important things to know about referencing in the APA7 style at Cranfield. 1. If you do not reference ...


Comments are closed.