Black Box Thinking, or Learning from Failure
06/09/2017

We were just reflecting at the latest Round Table on Matthew Syed’s book “Black Box Thinking” (2015, John Murray Publishing, London) and in particular on learning from failure.
So what I have done here is pull out some of the lessons which are really relevant for organisational learning. Syed compares the learning culture of the US Health Care Industry with the Aviation Industry and talks a lot about transparency, openness, reporting and the opportunity to learn from mistakes. The quote I really love is from Sullenberger (page 44) reflecting on his UA Airways Flight in 2009 which he “successfully” landed in the Potomac River after losing all his engines in a bird strike.
“Everything we know in aviation, every rule book, every procedure we have, we know because someone, somewhere died … We have purchased at great cost, lessons literally bought with blood that we have to preserve as institutional knowledge and pass on to succeeding generations. We cannot have the moral failure of forgetting these lessons and have to relearn them.”
Syed also talks about organisations being open to learning or not.
“For our purpose, a closed loop is where failure doesn’t lead to progress as information on errors or weaknesses is misinterpreted or ignored; an open loop does lead to progress because the feedback is rationally acted upon.” (page 15)
From the book we also distilled a list of reasons why organisations don’t learn.
- Lack of failure
- Sometimes caused because you haven’t failed
- Sometimes caused because you play safe so avoid failure
- Blame culture
- Feedback
- Speed of feedback – the faster the better
- Clarity of feedback – so you can’t fudge the issue
- Granularity of the evidence – ditto
- Lack of retrospective review – do you do post investment reviews?
- Hierarchy
- A problem is when knowledge is handed down not discovered
- Culture of “inconvenient evidence”
- Top down v bottom up learning
- Language of a profession
- Is it an Error or complication? If the latter, you are obfuscating the fact a failure occurred
- Limit of an investigation
- Ask the “5 Whys”
And finally, some challenging questions to ask yourself about whether or not you learn as an individual. Syed’s comment is if you answer no to any of the following, then you are not open to learn!
- Do you fail in your judgements?
- Do you ever get access to the evidence that shows where you might be going wrong?
- Are your decisions ever challenged by objective data?
Mike Bourne
Categories & Tags:
Leave a comment on this post:
You might also like…
From taxidermy to forensic investigation: My journey at Cranfield
Christina Recheis completed her MSc in Forensic Investigation at Cranfield University in 2021 and specialised in forensic archaeology and anthropology. Her master's thesis focused on developing an algorithm to facilitate the identification of human remains, ...
Country stability and risk in BMI Research
If you need to know about country stability and risk, there are two Library services you ought to be looking at BMI Research. Country Risk report in BMI Research BMI covers country ...
How to present well as a group
You will have put a lot of work into your research or project and want to show everyone what you have achieved or discovered, so you need to impart this knowledge as clearly as possible. ...
Exploring the skies and beyond: My experience as a GREAT Scholar at Cranfield University
A place where innovation meets practice Cranfield University is renowned for its world-class facilities and resources. What stands out most to me though, is its unique connection to the aerospace industry. ...
Creating a new user account in Mendeley
Before you start using Mendeley reference management software, you will need to create an account. This is a really simple process and should take you no more than a couple of minutes. Just follow the ...
Shifting Gears: How virtual prototyping is driving the future of automotive and motorsport
The roar of the engine, the thrill of the track, the relentless pursuit of perfection – these are the hallmarks of racing cars. But even in the world of high-octane performance, ...
Mike, Some very good comments and observations here that complement the book review we did late last year. You see these sorts of failures every day – just last night I was watching the News and the report was about the plight of the Rohingya Muslims being subjected to genocide or clear out by the regime in Myanmar, and the relatively new President Aung San Suu Kyi (thought of as a saviour of human rights) essentially denying it is happening.