Performance Reporting Measures vs Performance Management Measures
29/11/2019

You may have read my blog from last week about A&E Wait Times. We indicated that the way these kinds of figures are reported, out of context, is hopeless in actually understanding what is going on.
But the problem doesn’t stop there. There is a fundamental problem with performance reporting, and the measures you see being utilised there, versus performance management and the measures being utilised here!
Let me explain.
Performance management requires you to understand the behaviour of business processes and make interventions to improve them. This implies that you use a small set of specific measures that we’ve blogged about before – see previous bloghttps://blogs.cranfield.ac.uk/leadership-management/cbp/the-future-of-operational-performance-management-part-3
For example, these performance management measures would include number of items coming into a process, number leaving a process, throughput time and so on.
Performance reporting is littered with measures that may appear to carry meaning for some people, but in our observations, have been misleading and impenetrable to many. And certainly don’t help understanding nor how to improve!
Here are some examples of reporting measures:
- % items completed: % implies a ratio – with a numerator and denominator. E.g. % Repairs Completed defined by (Number of Repairs Completed / Total Number of Repair Calls) * 100
- % completed within some timeframe: E.g. From last week’s A&E Figures, we saw % A&E attendants seen in 4 hours or under.
- Complicated Measure Combinations: E.g. % Forecast Accuracy in Supply-chain
- Applying sophisticated statistical treatment to raw performance measures that only stats specialists can read: E.g. Exponentially weighted moving averages
- Statistical representation of a population of people or things: E.g. Electric Car Use by Country
In today’s blog, we’ll look at why %’s are a problem (the argument is exactly the same for ratios) in trying to understand what is going on?
- % Repairs Completed: Let’s assume more is good and less is bad. Here’s how complicated we have made it to understand what is going on (see yellow box):
- % Repairs Completed has gone up (since it was last reported on). There are five different combinations of Number of Repairs Completed vs Total Number of Repair Calls:
i. Number of Repairs Completed has increased; Total Number of Repair Calls stays the same
ii. Number of Repairs Completed has increased; Total Number of Repair Calls increases, but at a slower rate
iii. Number of Repairs Completed has increased; Total Number of Repair Calls has decreased
iv. Number of Repairs Completed stays the same; Total Number of Repair Calls has decreased
v. Number of Repairs Completed has decreased; Total Number of Repair Calls decreases, but at a faster rate
- % Repairs Completed remains the same (since it was last reported on). There are three combinations of Number of Repairs Completed vs Total Number of Repair Calls:
i. Number of Repairs Completed has increased; Total Number of Repair Calls also increases at the same rate
ii. Number of Repairs Competed stays the same; Total Number of Repair Calls also stays the same
iii. Number of Repairs Completed has decreased; Total Number of Repair Calls also decreases at the same rate
- % Repairs Completed has gone down (since it was last reported on). There are five different combinations of Number of Repairs Completed vs Total Number of Repair Calls:
i. Number of Repairs Completed has decreased; Total Number of Repair Calls stays the same
ii. Number of Repairs Completed has decreased; Total Number of Repair Calls decreases, but at a slower rate
iii. Number of Repairs Completed has decreased; Total Number of Repair Calls has increased
iv. Number of Repairs Completed stays the same; Total Number of Repair Calls has increased
v. Number of Repairs Completed has increased; Total Number of Repair Calls increases, but at a faster rate

So, when we are performance managing, each of our two performance management measures can move one of 3 ways – go up, stay the same or go down. Simples!

But, when we are performance reporting, our one % reporting measure can move through any one of the 13 different combinations above! And I think Dilbert would have something to say about that!
And where %’s do come into their own is when drilling down using tools such as Pareto Charts to find root-causes of signals or drivers of patterns – more on this in our future blogs.
Why is the second example above – A&E attendances seen within 4 hours – a problem in trying to understand what is going on? For that you’ll need to read our next blog…
Categories & Tags:
Leave a comment on this post:
You might also like…
A beginner’s guide to sourcing a company beta
Beta is the measurement of a company’s common stock price volatility relative to the market. If you’re trying to find a current beta for a company there are a number of places to look. These ...
Credibility, confidence and collaborative focus: The impact of studying for a sustainability apprenticeship at Cranfield
For participants on Cranfield’s Sustainability Business Specialist Apprenticeship, it doesn’t take long for their studies to start to have an impact, with that impact ranging from personal growth and career progression, to organisational effect ...
Meet Mendeley: a powerful referencing tool that does the hard work for you!
Are you looking for a way to manage your references, create in-text citations and reference lists for your assignments or thesis? If so, you may wish to consider using Mendeley. What is it? Mendeley is ...
Adding documents to your Mendeley account
To make the most of a Mendeley account, it is useful to create and maintain a ‘Library’ of references. You can add references and documents to this Library in a number of ways: 1) Drag ...
Choosing the right reference management tool for you…
Are you thinking about using reference management software to help you manage your references? The Library is here to help you. While Mendeley has been our go-to reference management software for some years, we've recently ...
Cranfield Seed Fund recipient, Cosysense, are using AI to solve air conditioning problems and provide a net zero alternative
If you’ve ever worked in an office environment you’ve probably been involved in, or overheard, a conversation about the air conditioning. Well, it’s no surprise it’s a common complaint when research shows that up ...