COVID-19 and Open Science
21/04/2020

The Coronavirus is impacting virtually all parts of our lives; we need knowledge and practices from not only the medical field but from all areas of public health and the social sciences. The crisis has shone a light on just how critical the implications of Open Access (OA) can be to society: while researchers are working hard to find a vaccine and effective drugs, many publishers and service providers have stepped up to provide access to research and information temporarily.
The OA and research communities have been working for almost two decades to distribute research in the interest of strong science and the public good. This work has directly fed into new policies, work processes, services, tools, and infrastructure that have enabled access to critical knowledge in this crisis. In recent weeks more and more researchers have been sharing publications and data more quickly than ever before, starting with the genetic sequence of COVID-19 being posted in GenBank – an OA database; this, in turn, led to more articles, data and code being shared openly – without delay – to spur the race to develop a vaccine.
The research community has been creating new open data resources such as The Human Coronaviruses Data Initiative, the COVID-19 Open Source Dashboard, Wikiproject COVID-19 and the COVID Tracking Project. Far fewer data collections exist relative to publications, however. In the instances where data collections do exist, they are often presented as tools that visualise or crunch the data rather than store and share it, which reflects how much more needs to be done to encourage researchers to share their research data.
In terms of OA publications, resources and services such as CORD-19, LitCovid, or the Outbreak Science Rapid PREreview are now available. Many researchers are sharing initial results on bioRxiv and medRxiv so that their work can be viewed, reviewed and tested, quickly, by fellow researchers within their community.
A real need exists for a more rapid sharing of FAIR research data by researchers and governments alike. We are still a long way off from where we need to be and, although progress has been made to enable increased access to vital information, we must not go back to ‘business as usual’ after this current public health crisis has passed.
Photo by Brian McGowan on Unsplash
Categories & Tags:
Leave a comment on this post:
You might also like…
Working on your group project? We can help!
When undertaking a group project, typically you'll need to investigate a topic, decide on a methodology for your investigation, gather and collate information and data, share your findings with each other, and then formally report ...
Words matter – a conversational Integrated Vehicle Health Management lexicon
There are many well established barriers to successful digital transformation which prevent full realisation of desired benefits. It is generally recognised that only 30% of digital transformation efforts deliver these results. One of the ...
Library support for new research students
Welcome! We are very excited to welcome you to Cranfield, and we are looking forward to supporting you throughout your research degree. We are always happy to help you – all you need to do ...
Finding full-text Economist articles…
If you’re looking for The Economist, the place to go is ProQuest One Business. Follow these step-by-step instructions to get full-text access. Login here and click on the Publications option at the top, above the ...
New IEEE route to gold open access for UKRI-funded research
You probably know by now that if you publish a paper that acknowledges funding from UKRI (including Innovate UK) it must be made open access immediately upon publication with a CC-BY licence. To remind you, ...
OnePetro subscription ending 5 February
Our access to OnePetro will cease at the beginning of February. This database contains full text documents from professional societies that serve the oil and gas industry. It has experienced a significant drop in usage ...